what happens to medical and dental practices in Maryland divorces?

Maryland Divorce for Physicians & Dentists Who Own Practices

Information for doctors and dentists who own their practices and what happens to their medical or dental practices in Maryland divorce cases.

Did you know that the medical or dental office that you own is most likely considered marital property and your spouse could claim a financial interest in it if you are going through a divorce? Whether and to what extent your practice or ownership interest in a practice (if you are a part owner in a practice) is considered marital or non-marital property depends on when you acquired your practice relative to the date of your marriage and/or whether any marital funds were used to pay for any loans, improvements, or for other purposes in your practice even if you owned your practice prior to your marriage, inherited it, or if it was gifted to you.

A “non-owner spouse” can almost never become a shareholder, member, or a partner in “owner spouse’s” medical or dental practice after a divorce for a couple of reasons. First, if they are not a doctor or a dentist, they do not have the required license to become a part owner under Maryland law. Second, usually shareholders’ agreements, bylaws, operating agreements, or partnership agreements include provisions that restrict the transfer of ownership interest even if the non-owner spouse has the required medical or dental license. If you don’t yet have those provisions in your corporate documents then they should be reviewed and amended to provide those additional protections for you.

The “non-owner spouse’s” recourse is usually to try to valuate the “owner spouse’s” practice or  interest in a practice and then try to obtain a monetary award based on the equitable division of the marital portion of “owner spouse’s” interest in the practice. Keep in mind that the “non-owner spouse’s” monetary award will not be the entire value of the “owner spouse’s” interest in the practice because the value of “owner spouse’s” interest in the practice should be equitably divided between the spouses, which could be ½ of the value, less than ½, or more than ½ of the value depending on many factors listed in Maryland Code, Family Law § 8-205(b).

Therefore, the valuation of “owner spouse’s” practice becomes crucial and can make a material difference in the outcome of “owner spouse’s” case. But the valuation of “owner spouse’s” practice for divorce purposes is usually significantly lower than the valuation of the practice for the purpose of selling it. One of the major factors or defenses that an “owner-spouse” can invoke is that the substantial amount of the value of his/her practice consists of their personal goodwill, which in Maryland is considered non-martial property.

In Maryland, doctors, dentists, and other medical professionals are among those who could claim one of the highest levels of personal goodwill and therefore significantly reducing the value of their practices for divorce purposes, which will result in great reduction in the non-owner spouse’s monetary interest in the marital portion of the “owner spouse’s” medical or dental office. In Maryland, the court is also required to consider discounts for lack of marketability and lack of control if you are not the sole owner of the practice (and your ownership interest is 50% or less), which can further reduce the value of “owner spouse’s” practice for divorce purposes. It is quite possible to substantially reduce the value of a practice for divorce purposes by claiming the “owner spouse’s” personal goodwill, and applying discounts for marketability and lack of control if the “owner spouse” owns 50% or less interest in a practice. Considering that the value of practices are hundreds of thousands of dollars or even millions of dollars, an attorney who knows what s/he is doing can save you a substantial sum with the assistance of an expert valuation experts.

Finally, other than your practice you almost inevitably have other marital property, whether real or personal property, which could be used to off-set the value of your practice. For example, if you own a house that has equity or if your spouse has an interest in a property that is more valuable than yours, then the value of the “non-owner spouse’s” interest in those properties can be used to off-set the value of your practice. If you are trying to settle your case and reach an agreement with your spouse, then there can certainly be some “horse-trading” to help you reach a settlement.

A. Shane Kamkari, Esq.

ask@kamkarilaw.com

301-309-9002

In Strauss v. Strauss,101 Md. App. 490, 647 A.2d 818 (1994) Maryland Court of Special Appeals provided an in-depth analysis of valuation of dental and medical practices in divorce cases. The Court reiterated Maryland law that personal goodwill is not considered marital property and therefore should not be considered as part of the valuation of a practice in divorce cases. That means the personal goodwill portion of the valuation for dental and medical practices are non-marital property of the dentists or doctors who own their practices and not subject to equitable division of marital assets. The following is an excerpt of the Court’s Ruling:

“As background, we note that it is well established in Maryland law that goodwill, although an intangible asset, is nonetheless a legally protected property right. Archer, 303 Md. at 356, 493 A.2d 1074; Schill v. Remington Putnam Co., 179 Md. 83, 88-89, 17 A.2d 175 (1941); Green v. Green, 64 Md. App. 122, 134, 494 A.2d 721 (1985). Based on this status, the goodwill of a spouse’s business is to be valued and equitably divided pursuant to the three step marital property analysis. Nevertheless, when the business in question is a sole professional practice, owners have claimed that any goodwill inuring to the entity is not marital property, but, rather, a direct reflection of the owner’s reputation and skill and therefore “uniquely personal” to the holder. This rationale was first acknowledged in Maryland in Brown v. Benzinger, 118 Md. 29, 36, 84 A. 79 (1912), in which the Court distinguished between the sale of the good will of a trade or business of a commercial character where the location is an important feature of the business, and the sale of an established practice and goodwill of a person engaged in a profession or calling where the income therefrom is the immediate or direct result of his labor and skill and where integrity, skill, ability and other desirable personal qualities follow the person and not the place.” 

You can find the Court’s decision in its entirety at Strauss v. Strauss :: 1994 :: Maryland Court of Special Appeals Decisions :: Maryland Case Law :: Maryland Law :: US Law :: Just


family law attorney for doctors, family lawyer for dentists, divorce attorney for dentists, divorce lawyer for doctors in Maryland.

 

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email

DISCLAIMER

No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website. Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Kamkari Law Offices (hereinafter “Law Offices”) or one of its lawyer(s) creates an attorney-client relationship between you and the Law Offices and/or any of its attorneys. You will become a client of the Law Offices only if and when you sign and engagement agreement setting forth the scope of the Law Offices’ engagement, the fee arrangement and other relevant matters. As a matter of policy, the Law Offices does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed retainer agreement or engagement letter. (The Law Offices may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.)

No Confidentiality. You may not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to the Law Offices. Your use of this website does not make you a client of the Law Offices or even a prospective client of the Law Offices. If you have confidential information that you would like to give to any lawyer affiliated with the Law Offices, please communicate with one if the Law Offices’ lawyer(s) in person or by telephone–not by filling in any form on this website or by sending an unsolicited email to the Law Offices or any of its lawyer(s).

No Legal Advice Intended. This website includes general information about legal issues and developments in the law. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and must not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You need to contact a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction for advice on specific legal issues problems.

No Intent to Refer Matters to Other Firms. Unless otherwise expressly stated on a particular page of the Law Offices’ website, retainer agreement, or engagement letter, Law Offices intends to act as primary counsel in representing clients who retain the Attorney.

Photographs. The photographs on this website may not be of actual lawyer(s), employees and/or clients of the Law Offices unless otherwise noted. The cost of this website is paid for by the Law Offices and not by any other lawyer or firm.

No Guarantee of Results. Some of the case summaries, reports of past results and individual lawyer biographies on this website describe past matters handled for clients of the Law Offices. These descriptions are meant only to provide information to the public about the activities and experience of our lawyer(s). They are not intended as a guarantee that the same or similar results can be obtained in every matter undertaken by our lawyer(s). You must not assume that a similar result can be obtained in a legal matter of interest to you. The outcome of a particular matter can depend on a variety of factors—including the specific factual and legal circumstances, the ability of opposing counsel, and, often, unexpected developments beyond the control of any client or lawyer.
No Claim of Expertise or Board Certification. This website lists areas in which lawyer(s) of the Law Offices practice. In so doing, no Law Offices’ lawyer makes a claim of “expertise,” “specialization” or “board certification.” Any lawyer(s) of the Law Offices who are properly board certified in a practice area have so indicated in their biographies.

IRS Circular 230 Notice. In accordance with Internal Revenue Service requirements, this is to inform you that any information on this website that could be construed as United States tax advice is not written or intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed on this website. See IRS Circular 230.

No Tax Advice. This website is not intended to provide any tax advice. Furthermore Law Offices does not provide tax advice to any client and an services of accountant(s) should be utilized regarding any tax questions.

Links to Third Party Websites. As a convenience, this website provides links to various third-party websites. Such linked websites are not under the control of the Law Offices, and the Law Offices assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the contents of such websites.

Authorized Practice of Law. The jurisdictions in which each of the Law Offices’ lawyer(s) are licensed to practice are Maryland and the District of Columbia. The ability of any Law Offices’ lawyer to engage in any activities for a client outside of that lawyer’s state(s) of licensure is subject to state statutes, professional standards and court rules. The Law Offices does not seek, and this website is not intended to solicit, legal engagements in jurisdictions outside of our lawyer(s)’ states of licensure when such engagements would constitute the unauthorized practice of law in any jurisdiction. In certain occasions the Law Offices may engage and/or employ of-counsel in other jurisdictions should it be necessary to represent the client outside of Maryland and the Washington, DC.

Responsible Lawyer. The Law Offices lawyer responsible for the content of this website is Afshin Shane Kamkari, Esq.

Bona Fide Office. The Law Offices operates a bona fide office at 10411 Motor City Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817.
Copyright. Copyright © by Kamkari Law Offices. All rights reserved. You may download and print out any part of this website for your own personal, non-commercial use. Any other reproduction or retransmission of the contents of this website without our prior written consent is prohibited.